Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Actions Speak Louder
Robert Greene
Monday, September 28, 2009
Welcome!
Friday, September 25, 2009
What God Wants
We might think that God wanted simple obedience to a set of rules: whereas he really wants people of a particular sort.
CS Lewis
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Cultural Relativism
Tolerance is certainly a virtue, but is this a good argument for it? I think not. If morality is relative to each culture, then if the culture in question does not have a principle of tolerance, its members have no obligation to be tolerant.
Not only do relativists fail to offer a basis for criticizing those who are intolerant, they cannot rationally criticize anyone who espouses what they might regard as a heinous principle. Relativists cannot morally criticize anyone outside their own culture. Adolf Hitler’s genocidal actions, as long as they are culturally accepted, are as morally legitimate as Mother Teresa’s work of mercy.
There are other disturbing consequences of ethical relativism. It seems to entail that reformers are always (morally) wrong since they go against the tide of cultural standards. William Wilberforce was wrong in the eighteenth Century to oppose slavery, the British were immoral in opposing the burning of widows in India.
There is an even more basic problem with the notion that morality is dependent on cultural acceptance for its validity. The problem is that of culture or society is notoriously difficult to define. This is especially true in a pluralistic society like our own where the notion seems to be vague with unclear boundaries.
One person may belong to several societies (subcultures).. if Mary is a US citizen and a member of the Roman Catholic church, she is wrong if she chooses to have an abortion and not-wrong if she acts against the teaching of the church on abortion.
This moral Babel.. has lost its action-guiding function.
Louis Pojman
Ethical Theory
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Getting and Giving
Winston Churchill
You Have Your Truth, I have Mine
On the basis of (moral) subjectivism Adolf Hitler and serial murderer Ted Bundy could be considered as a moral as Gandhi, as long as each lived by his own standards, whatever those might be.
Although many students say they espouse subjectivism, there is evidence that it conflicts with other of their moral views. They typically condemn Hitler as an evil man for his genocidal policies. A contradiction seems to exist between subjectivism and the very concept of morality.
Louis Pojman
Ethical Theory
Monday, September 21, 2009
Our Narrative
Nissim Taleb
Friday, September 18, 2009
Changing with Age
Lynn Hall
Slow to Anger
Mark Cosgrove
Counseling for Anger
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Guilt and Blame
Mark Cosgrove
Counseling for Anger
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Think About It
Albert Einstein
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Birth Order
Everyone takes it personally when it comes to birth order.
Children and parents alike are profoundly affected by the constellations of siblings.. But that doesn’t mean the effects of birth order are as clear or straightforward as we sometimes make them sound. Indeed, birth order can be used to explain every trait and its precise opposite. I’m competitive, driven — typical oldest child! My brother, two years younger, is even more competitive, more driven — typical second child, always trying to catch up!
“Too many parents are haunted by experiences both good and bad that they identify with their birth order,” said Dr. Peter A. Gorski, a professor of pediatrics, public health and psychiatry at the University of South Florida. And that might lead them to classify their own children according to birth order, he went on, which in turn can lead to a sense of identification or even rejection and to “self-fulfilling prophecies.”
“Birth order doesn’t cause anything,” (says) Frank J. Sulloway, a visiting scholar at theUniversity of California Berkeley Dr. Sulloway said. “It’s simply a proxy for the actual mechanisms that go on in family dynamics that shape character and personality.”
Now, of course birth order played into my patients’ patterns, but so did gender and birth spacing and, above all, temperament.
"I wouldn’t discount the impact of birth order,” Dr. Gorski told me. “It sets up the structure of one’s place in relation to others from the beginning, as we learn how to react to people of different ages and different relationships.”
Perri Klass
New York Times
Monday, September 14, 2009
Friday, September 11, 2009
Acting The Part
The feeling of not being up to the job, the belief that the role is too big, is something every leader has felt. It is evidence that the role is greater than the individual—and thus worth taking on. Pollack made the leader's requisite leap into the unknown, accepting the risk of failure that is the first step in becoming a leader—and he excelled.
That adaptive capacity is the most important attribute in determining who will become a leader. It's also the defining trait of the best actors. Inhabiting roles other than the one most of us think of as self is essential to both. So is the empathy needed to project yourself into someone else's skin.
Like great actors, great leaders create and sell an alternative vision of the world, a better one in which we are an essential part. Philosopher Isaiah Berlin wrote that Churchill idealized his countrymen with such intensity that in the end they rose to his ideal. Mahatma Gandhi made India proud of herself. Washington and the other Founding-Fathers shared that great leader's gift of making people believe they could be—and were—part of a great nation. Martin Luther King Jr. had that same genius.
When you consider such towering and theatrical leaders, you realize leadership may be the greatest performing art of all—the only one that creates institutions of lasting value, institutions that can endure long after the stars who envisioned them have left the theater.
Warren Bennis
The Essential Bennis
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The Little Things
Stephen Goforth
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Let's Make a Deal
That’s the question UK researchers put to more than 40,000 participants through a BBC website. They wanted to know if a person's tendancy to spend or save comes from their understanding of financies or if it the decision reflects the person's overall personality.
Almost half of those responding preferred getting quick cash. This impulsive group turned down an interest rate hundreds of times higher than what they could get from normal investments. The people showing this a desire for immediate gratification was also more likely to indulge in other impulsive behaviors.. like overeating, smoking and even infidelity. The financial impulsivity was a common theme running through their lives.
The study was conducted by University College London and the University of Warwick. You'll find details in the journal Personality and Individual Differences. (The question was actually given in pounds instead of dollars. So the choice was 45 or 70 pounds).
Stephen Goforth
Monday, September 7, 2009
Angry Smokers
Friday, September 4, 2009
Wednesday, September 2, 2009
Standing
Martin Luther King
Tuesday, September 1, 2009
Skeptics
Stephen Goforth