Anybody can become angry - that is easy, but to be angry with the right person and to the right degree and at the right time and for the right purpose, and in the right way - that is not within everybody's power and is not easy.
Aristotle
Friday, September 26, 2008
Wednesday, September 24, 2008
Admitting Error
Any man worth his salt will stick up for what he believes right, but it takes a slightly better man to acknowledge instantly and without reservation that he is in error.
General Peyton March
General Peyton March
Monday, September 22, 2008
Suffering
Although the world is full of suffering, it is also full of the overcoming of it. Helen Keller
Monday, September 15, 2008
Friday, September 12, 2008
Freedom and Imitation
When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other.
Eric Hoffer
Eric Hoffer
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
Enough Religion
We have enough religion to make us hate, but not enough to make us love one another..
Jonathan Swift
Jonathan Swift
Monday, September 8, 2008
Friday, September 5, 2008
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Limitations
Rather than talking about your self-imposed limitations, talk about your openness to change and adaptability.
Stephen Goforth
Stephen Goforth
Tuesday, September 2, 2008
Does a Killer Deserve the Truth?
The Gospels tell us that Jesus was asked which commandment was greatest (Matthew 26:36-40). For him to give an answer implies there is a hierarchy of commands (and he did answer the question).
Just as not all commandments are on equal footing, not all sin should be treated as equal.* A hierarchy of commands implies a hierarchy of sin.
Slapping you is wrong but killing you is worse and deserves more condemnation. Thus, hitting falls below murder on our list of “top sins”. We recognize this in our legal system by giving harsher sentences to some murders (planned) over others (spontaneous and unplanned).
This comes into play when absolutes conflict. What do we do our options are either, for instance, lying or murder? Some people will tell you to choice the “lesser of two evils”. But is choosing evil ever acceptable? Are there situations where we have no choice but to sin?
Let’s put it in more concrete terms.
Perhaps you’ve been presented this dilemma. Let’s say you are sitting in the library, minding your own business, reading a book. Suddenly, a panting, red-faced young man runs past you. He hides behind a bookcase. Before you have time to take in the scene, another man comes charging inside the library. He looks like he’s been running as well. This second man holds a knife in his hand. You recognized his face. He’s an escaped killer who’s apparently ready to take another life. He looks you in the eye and says, “Where is he? Where is John?”
What do you say?
You should always tell the truth, right? But if you do and point out the victim’s hiding place, you would be guilty of helping the lunatic commit murder.
Would you say, “I don’t know” or “He’s not here”? Either statement is a lie. How would you justify it?
If you say nothing, wouldn’t you be guilty of withholding the truth? Wouldn’t that be wrong as well? Your silence may convey to the madman that John was indeed close and he may start looking for his victim. Wouldn’t that make you accountable as well?
The question really is, when there are moral dilemmas, that is, two absolutes that conflict (in this case, the charge not to lie comes against the charge to not murder), are these dilemmas real? And if so, what is the proper action?
If we accept there are “graded absolutes” then the choice is not the “lesser evil” but the “greater good”.
When a small child hands us a crude crayon drawing, we are not obligated in the name of truth to call it “a poor excuse for art”. There are greater “rules” that apply here. Just like when your wife asks if she looks overweight in a new dress. The brute facts may say one thing but the love in your heart will speak a “greater truth” into the situation.
(*this is not to say that all sin is equal in its consequences for any evil will separate us from our creator).
Stephen Goforth
Just as not all commandments are on equal footing, not all sin should be treated as equal.* A hierarchy of commands implies a hierarchy of sin.
Slapping you is wrong but killing you is worse and deserves more condemnation. Thus, hitting falls below murder on our list of “top sins”. We recognize this in our legal system by giving harsher sentences to some murders (planned) over others (spontaneous and unplanned).
This comes into play when absolutes conflict. What do we do our options are either, for instance, lying or murder? Some people will tell you to choice the “lesser of two evils”. But is choosing evil ever acceptable? Are there situations where we have no choice but to sin?
Let’s put it in more concrete terms.
Perhaps you’ve been presented this dilemma. Let’s say you are sitting in the library, minding your own business, reading a book. Suddenly, a panting, red-faced young man runs past you. He hides behind a bookcase. Before you have time to take in the scene, another man comes charging inside the library. He looks like he’s been running as well. This second man holds a knife in his hand. You recognized his face. He’s an escaped killer who’s apparently ready to take another life. He looks you in the eye and says, “Where is he? Where is John?”
What do you say?
You should always tell the truth, right? But if you do and point out the victim’s hiding place, you would be guilty of helping the lunatic commit murder.
Would you say, “I don’t know” or “He’s not here”? Either statement is a lie. How would you justify it?
If you say nothing, wouldn’t you be guilty of withholding the truth? Wouldn’t that be wrong as well? Your silence may convey to the madman that John was indeed close and he may start looking for his victim. Wouldn’t that make you accountable as well?
The question really is, when there are moral dilemmas, that is, two absolutes that conflict (in this case, the charge not to lie comes against the charge to not murder), are these dilemmas real? And if so, what is the proper action?
If we accept there are “graded absolutes” then the choice is not the “lesser evil” but the “greater good”.
When a small child hands us a crude crayon drawing, we are not obligated in the name of truth to call it “a poor excuse for art”. There are greater “rules” that apply here. Just like when your wife asks if she looks overweight in a new dress. The brute facts may say one thing but the love in your heart will speak a “greater truth” into the situation.
(*this is not to say that all sin is equal in its consequences for any evil will separate us from our creator).
Stephen Goforth
Monday, September 1, 2008
True Humility
A poor self-image is not to be equated with humility or the mark of a servant.
Charles Swindoll
Charles Swindoll
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)